![]() |
![]() |
| Baker County Cultural Plan | |
Cultural Inventory and Assessment
An assessment from the Cultural Trust committee and results from the survey concluded some of the following general description of Baker County's cultural and social condition:Challenges and Barriers to Cultural Expression
-Lack of funding for accomplishing cultural projects
-Lack of awareness, coordination, and advertising of opportunities
-Apathy and lack of leadership
The committee discussed barriers, and developed ways to incorporate these concerns into the priorities, and also addressed how these identified barriers might be more of an issue of perceptions. Although lack of funding was identified as the biggest issue, there is significant evidence of great success in community funding of projects such as the Oregon Trail Interpretive Center, the Leo Adler Memorial Parkway, the Baker Sports Complex, the Sumpter Valley Railway and many other civic, charitable, and educational projects both large and small.
Analysis indicated the problem may not be lack of funding, but a large number of ambitious, large-scale projects envisioned by the community, and only a limited amount of available funds to achieve all the desired projects. Lack of focus to complete targeted
projects may be more of a problem than a lack of funding.
Perception of apathy may be closely linked to ideas of lack of awareness and lack of leadership. Considerable evidence shows residents of the county have the capability to accomplish big projects, but again, the large number of projects, ideas, and ambitions means not all projects get accomplished quickly, and a lack of awareness may indicate that
not all residents realize or are informed on how to become involved in projects, resulting in a perception of disinterest or lack of leadership. It is possible that lack of awareness contributes to misperceptions in that, if residents don't hear about progress, accomplishments, and efforts of neighbors in the county, they assume someone else is taking care of projects and do not become involved, thereby contributing to the idea that apathy is a barrier. Also, mildly interested people may not be aware of how to become involved, and may need those connections with people and information about projects to help them become passionate and involved about cultural projects.
Based on these perceptions of barriers, the committee determined that all priorities must include a component of publicizing accomplishments. Project successes and participation of volunteers need to be showcased. There needs to be more networking to connect groups and individuals to the projects they most care about. There needs to be more effort to show results. Groups and individuals need to coordinate efforts to finish current projects, and carefully pick the huge new projects so individuals and funding do not get spread too thin.
The prevalence of historic resources topping the list of cultural assets and cultural identity in Baker County is evidence of tremendous success in past projects and successful promotion in heritage tourism and heritage related projects. Although there is desire to continue those successes, the committee felt there needs to be extra effort toward raising awareness of art and humanities projects in Baker County, and that premise is reflected in this plan.
In addition to some component that will include publicizing efforts and successes of all projects in the cultural plan, it is suggested that all strategies in the plan include some element related to economic development, and some element/benefit toward education and cultivation in arts, humanities, and heritage for county residents of all ages.
Priorities, Strategies, Benchmarks,
and Performance Measures
(Priorities are based on data from the survey and the events held to gather data-again, there were a lot of respondents who want it all)
PRIORITY 1: Develop more public spaces for performance and cultural activities and improve existing spaces.
Strategy 1 - Develop outdoor performance space.
Quantitative Benchmark: Accomplish plans already in place. Create timelines for theater, performance, and rehearsal spaces at Crossroads Art Center and Eastern Oregon Regional Theater, for classrooms at Crossroads Art Center and Baker City Community Center, and for continued improvement of Eastern Oregon Regional Museum and Sumpter Museum.
Qualitative Benchmark: See a 50% increase in current offerings of concerts, performances, cultural events, and exhibits by 2007.
Strategy 2 - Develop small, versatile indoor theater(s)
Quantitative Benchmark: Develop a new city park and square in Baker City by 2007. Approve construction plans and fundraising plan in place for amphitheater or bandshell by 2006.
Qualitative Benchmark: Expansion of outdoor events, plays, concerts, and art markets.
Strategy 3 - Encourage development of public squares or pocket parks in all county communities.
PRIORITY 2: Improve Communication and Coordination of cultural activities.
Strategy 1 - Marquee on Campbell Street in Baker City.
Quantitative Benchmark: A strategy for maintenance of information in place by 2006.
Qualitative Benchmark: Increased attendance at cultural activities by local residents and tourists.
Strategy 2 - Place information kiosks near grocery stores or other high-pedestrian traffic areas.
Quantitative Benchmark: Four kiosks in place by late 2005.
Qualitative Benchmark: Increased attendance at cultural activities.
Strategy 3 - Encourage an existing cultural group with an appropriate mission to take on maintenance of marquee, kiosks, website, and calendar coordination.
Quantitative Benchmark: Kiosks and marquee to be operational by 2006 as well as additional coordination and communication through visitor center calendars, website,
newspaper listings, regional and state listings.
Qualitative Benchmark: Improved scheduling, implementation, and attendance for culture activities throughout the county (with Baker County Visitor & Convention Bureau/Baker County Unlimited serving as a hub).
PRIORITY 3: Work with local economic development programs, such as Baker County Unlimited and Baker City/County Economic Development Arts Advisory Committee*, to conceive and implement economic development projects related to culture.
Strategy 1 - Cultivate performing arts groups and events related to fine arts and humanities with financial support.
Quantitative Benchmark:
Qualitative Benchmark: More performing groups and events. More evidence of tourism drawn to cultural events. Improvement indicated in economic reports.
Strategy 2 - Develop and fund an artisans' directory listing for local artists, crafters, galleries, and suppliers relevant to arts and heritage.
Quantitative Benchmark: Directory completed and available by 2006. In addition, a 10 percent increase in business contacts for listed artists/crafters/businesses.
Qualitative Benchmark: Growing awareness of availability of artists, supplies, and services will attract more artists, writers, craftspeople, etc. to the area.
Strategy 3 - Develop driving tours and maps of historic locations, ghost towns, galleries, and other cultural features in Baker County.
Quantitative Benchmark: At least one product available by 2005 (map or driving CD/tape tour). Plans in place for at least one additional or updated product each year by various county groups.
Qualitative Benchmark: Increase in visitation to heritage sites by cultural tourists, increased awareness amongst county residents of landmarks. Evidence of increased cultural tourism in economic reports.
Strategy 4 - Financial support for individuals developing local heritage related publications.
*This is a new committee under Economic Development that will identify potential for public art.
PRIORITY 4: Enhance public spaces.
Strategy 1 - Identify projects for creations of public gardens and public art and find appropriate funding to accomplish.*
Quantitative Benchmark: By 2005, put in place a list of identified projects, potential locations, and proposed projects. Compile a list of available funding sources through county, state, regional, and nonprofit funding programs. Find successful matches of projects to funding. Compile a list of local organizations or individual artists available to create and/or maintain public gardens and public art pieces.
Qualitative Benchmark: Begin to see ripple effect in sprucing up of local buildings and gardens, increased awareness and appreciation for art, architecture and landscaping, additional public art or landscaping funded as part of commercial construction projects, additional inquiries or proposals for public art and landscaping projects.
Strategy 2 - Provide technical support and funding for creation of heritage markers.
Quantitative Benchmark: Completion of marker projects already proposed. Plans in place for new markers, or updated/rehabilitated existing markers.
Qualitative Benchmark: Additional locations for local residents and tourists to visit to learn about local history. Increased awareness and appreciation of historic sites and significance in neighborhoods and towns as well as in outlying areas. Retain and increase local pride and identification with historic roots.
PRIORITY 5: Cultivate development of individuals in arts, humanities, and heritage awareness and skills.
Strategy 1 - Create and support classes and workshops for lifelong learning in the arts, historic preservation, and humanities.
Quantitative Benchmark: A 20% increase in arts classes available in all areas of the county. Classes held in new and unconventional locations. More diverse sponsorship of workshops
and classes. More lectures/ workshops/classes related to writing, poetry, preservation of historic architecture, historic research/oral history.
Qualitative Benchmark: Increased number of artists, writers, musicians, skilled crafters in communities. Greater involvement and energy in projects related to the arts and elevated level of skill evident in planning processes and results.
Strategy 2 - Support development of opportunities for developing and showcasing local
individuals and groups with more art shows, performance events, historic/heritage events.
Quantitative Benchmark: Additional two to three performances or art shows throughout the county each month. At least one new art or performance-based festival in the county
annually. At least one new heritage-based event, performance, or exhibit annually in the county.
*Again, a committee is currently working on this through Economic Development.
Qualitative Benchmark: Greater community participation evident in increased attendance at events. A wider range of participation by individuals. More support and opportunities for K-12 public and private school programs related to arts and humanities.
Structural Makeup of the Baker County
Cultural Trust Commission
-At least seven and no more than nine members.
-Representatives from major arts, humanities, and heritage organizations in Baker County.
-At least one representative from the education field.
-At least two of the members shall be from communities or areas outside of Baker City.
-Members to serve three-year terms, staggered to ensure continuity.
-Members nominated from cultural groups, appointed by County Commissioners.
-Members to meet quarterly.
Special Thanks to the Members
of the Baker County Cultural Planning Committee.
Sarah LeCompte, Chair, Cultural Planning Committee; Director, National Historic Oregon Trail Interpretive Center
Bob Evans, Secretary, Cultural Planning Committee; Program Director, Community Literacy Coalition, Inc.
Aletha Bonebrake, Director, Baker County Library
Jeff Sizer, Instructor, Baker Middle School & High School Band; Musician
Lynne Burroughs, Instructor, Baker High School English & Theater Arts; Director & Co-Founder, Eastern Oregon Regional Theater
Allison Mickens -Valerio, Publisher
Chary Mires, Coordinator, Oregon Trail Regional Museum; Representative, Baker County Museum Commission